 | Mississippi. Supreme Court, Thomas Alexander Marshall, William C. Smedes, Volney Erskine Howard, Robert John Walker, John Franklin Cushman, James Zachariah George - 1834 - 632 pàgines
...a precedent or a subsequent condition, or a covenant be a dependent or an independent covenant, is to be collected from the evident sense and meaning of the parties: and however transposed they may be in the deed, whether they be precedent or subsequent, dependent or independent,... | |
 | Mississippi. Supreme Court - 1890 - 972 pàgines
...precedent or subsequent, or whether there is dependence or independence of stipulations or requirements, is to be collected from the evident sense and meaning of the parties as they have expressed themselves. The question of precedency depends ' on the order of time in which... | |
 | Kevin M. Teeven - 1990 - 404 pàgines
[ El contingut d’aquesta pàgina està restringit ] | |
 | S. M. Waddams - 2005 - 940 pàgines
[ El contingut d’aquesta pàgina està restringit ] | |
 | George Blaxland - 1999 - 712 pàgines
[ El contingut d’aquesta pàgina està restringit ] | |
 | 1906 - 1268 pàgines
...covenants in such contracts. In the language of Lord Mansfield, in Kingston v. Preston, 2 Doug. 690: 'The dependence, or independence, of covenants, was...deed, their precedency must depend on the order of tluie in which the Intent of the transaction requires their performance.' Hence the real question to... | |
| |
His lordship then proceeded to say, that the dependence or independence of covenants was to be collected from the evident sense and meaning of the parties, and that, however transposed they might be in the deed, their precedency must depend on the order... 
