| Daniel Adams - 1833 - 264 pągines
...the two remaining numbers for the second term, and the greater for the first ; and, in either case, **multiply the second and third terms together, and divide the product by the first** for the answer, which will always be of the same denomination as ftie third term. Note 1. If the first... | |
| Charles Davies - 1833 - 270 pągines
...least of the remaining numbers in the first place, but when it is less, place the greater there. Then **multiply the second and third terms together and divide the product by the first** term : the quo tif.nl will be the fourth term or answer sought, and •will be of the same denomination... | |
| Frederick Emerson - 1834 - 288 pągines
...the fourth, make the less of the two remaining terms the first term, and the greater the second: then **multiply the second and third terms together, and divide the product by the first** term: the quotient will be the fourth term, or answer. 1. Ifl buy 871 yards of cotton cloth for 78... | |
| Frederick Emerson - 1832 - 216 pągines
...than the third, make the less of the two remaining terms the second term, and the greater the first. **Multiply the second and third terms together, and divide the product by the first** term: the quotient will be the fourth term, or answer. If there are different denominations in the... | |
| George Alfred - 1834 - 312 pągines
...require it. 6. When all the terms of the stating are reduced as above directed, (if necessary) — then **multiply the second and third terms together, and divide the product by** the^rst term — the quotient will be the fourth term or answer to the question, and of Kke name with... | |
| Thomas Smith (of Liverpool.) - 1835 - 160 pągines
...made it fifteen times too large, divide it by this 15; that is to say, we have the same result if we **multiply the second and third terms together, and divide the product by the first. AND** THIS is THE RULE ; this, when the terms are properly placed, this MULTIPLYING THE SECOND AND THE THIRD... | |
| Francis Walkingame - 1835
...proportion, if necessary, to the same name, and the third to the lowest denomination mentioned in it, then **multiply the second and third terms together, and divide the product by the first;** the quotient will be the answer to the question in the same denomination the third term was reduced... | |
| Stephen Pike - 1835 - 198 pągines
...and if the third term consist of several denominations, reduce it to its lowest denomination; then, **Multiply the second and third terms together, and divide the product by the first** term: the quotient will je the answer. Note. — The product of the second and third termsis of he... | |
| George Willson - 1836 - 192 pągines
...mentioned in it.* * It is often better to reduce the lower denominations to the decimal of the highest. 3. **Multiply the second and third terms together, and...product by the first, and the quotient will be the** answer, in that denomination which the third term was left in. In arranging the first two terms, we... | |
| A. Turnbull - 1836 - 335 pągines
...these terms would occupy in the statement, as shown above. Now as in every Rule of Three question, we **multiply the second and third terms together, and divide the product" by the first,** in cases where we work by fractions, the numbers which would form the second and third terms, if the... | |
| |