mind is. It is when we come to the Church of England that the difficulty arises. In her, taking her as a whole, both these advantages are absent. There are some of us, however, who on this point are quite at one with the Roman Catholics. We are utter disbelievers in simple Bible teaching-not only in its value when given, but in the possibility of giving it. I say this, I should like to add, of simple Bible teaching, not of Bible teaching without the qualifying adjective. All denominational teaching that is worth anything must be Bible teaching. A teacher in an Anglican or a Roman Catholic school who knows his business has no need to trouble himself about catechisms. From the Bible, properly understood and explained, he can draw everything that he wants. But simple Bible teaching is commonly Bible teaching with most of what makes it valuable left out. I know that in law it need not be so. I know that the authors of the Act of 1870 meant to exclude only formularies, and not the doctrines embodied in them. But I know also that this theory has never been tested in & court of law; and I have a strong suspicion that a teacher in a Council school who was found explaining such texts as 'This is My Body' or 'Whose sins ye remit, they are remitted to them,' in the sense in which the words are understood by Roman Catholics or High Churchmen, would either be sent about his business or be transferred to some more congenial' atmosphere. It would not be regarded as 'simple’ Bible teaching. Nor do I for a moment say that it would deserve the name. The Bible is not a simple book, and the teacher who so regards it will very soon come to grief in his exposition of it. Further than this, there is the question of authority. Even the present Government has found the need of some method of determining what simple Bible teaching is. Possibly, had the Progressives retained their majority, Mr. McKenna would have entrusted the drafting of a simple Bible creed to the London County Council. As it is, he has preferred to draw from some convenient pigeon-hole a forgotten syllabus put out by the discarded London School Board. Now, I have a greatfrespect for the late Mr. W. H. Smith, who was, I believe, the chief author of this immortal document; but I know of no Divine commission in virtue of which I can accept his account of what is essential (as distinct from what is merely additional and ornamental) - in Bible teaching. To High Churchmen the source as well as the matter of teaching is important, and to take it from a wrong source is in effect to ignore the right source. This doctrine may be narrow, obscurantist, reactionary-insulting to God and degrading to man. But, for all that, it is a doctrine actually held by a minority-small, indeed, but still appreciable of the English people. They can be put down, of course, if the majority choose to take the trouble ; but the trouble · I have heard that the late Professor Huxley was also engaged in the preparation of the syllabus which the First Lord of the Admiralty has introduced into his Bill, but I have not at band the means of verifying this statement. would be considerable, and I see no reason to suppose that any Government that this country is likely to see in power would go the length necessary for the purpose. If they are not put down, they will continue to make themselves heard whenever an occasion offers itself—and it will offer itself pretty often. If the education controversy is settled in a way that they think unjust, they will be a standing element in parliamentary or municipal elections, and come to be everywhere recognised as a force cutting across the ordinary party lines and confusing every political calculation. That Parliament can disregard their demand for equality and pass a Bill which they will think radically unjust I do not dispute. If Liberals think proper to set up a new form of religious preference, if Nonconformists think proper to set up a new form of ecclesiastical establishment, it is in their power to do it. What is not in their power is to insure that this one-sided compromise will work. What seemed more reasonable on paper than the Act of 1902 ? What was more open to ridicule than the scruples of men who drew nice distinctions between payments out of taxes and pay. ments out of rates ? What could be better founded than the statement that not one parent in a hundred thousand had ever raised any objection to the religious teaching given in Church schools ? Yet what has been the history of that Act, regarded as an educational settlement? The Liberal Government, a majority of the Bishops, and, very possibly, a majority even of the clergy and laity of the Church of England seem disposed to repeat the experiment with the parts reversed. Have they any reason to suppose that the second experiment will do more for peace than the first? The believers in equality as the only possible foundation for a just and lasting settlement of this long controversy will not be strong enough to prevent its adoption : that I concede at once. Will they be strong enough to wreck it when adopted? Upon that point I cannot speak; but this I think I can say: If they fail to wreck it, it will not be for want of trying D. C. LATHIBUBY. The Editor of THE NINETEENTH CENTURY cannot undertake to return unaccepted MSS. INDEX TO VOL. LXIII The titles of articles are printed in italics ABB A Bleusinian Mysteries in Modern Greek Folklore, 651-660 305-310 and his successors, 63-76 to work, 133-137, 386-397 tion : a Peril to India, 568-581 297-304 West Passage, 245–253 Crime—a Rejoinder, 199-208 Cyprus, 751-762 OHU fession of journalism, 327–340 Canadian trade, 595-606 fields, 398-410 185 mission, 151-165 517-533 lish-Canadian View, 595-606 and the Future of Macedonia, 722– YAMPBELL (LADY MARY, Vis. travels, 428-437 Cape railways and State management, and the Public's Attitude thereto, Carmen Sylva, see Roumania (The Queen of) 311-326 254-271 lish and Music-Drama of the libellers, 454 475 Cheyne (Dr. T. K.), The Decline of the Childers (Hugh), The Pall Mall Children and servants, rational methods Charles van Lerberghe, 411-427 Child's Recollections, A, 282–244 the, and their Significance, 888–902 denite Free Trade, 869-871 Reformer, 854-864 CHU GRE Elementary Schools, Equality and, Eleusinian Mysteries, Echoes of the, Elkind (Dr. Louis), The Emperor Empire Day, 1019-1021 48-61 and a School of Journalism, 327– 835-851 Esher (Viscount), General Gordon : a Eugenics as a Social Force, 962-972 Compromise, An, 697-706 Peers, and the Crowd, 825-834 in its relation to Early History, • Fairy Prince, The, 138–143 447-453 Forest conservation in India, 637-650 607-613 Ex-Prisoner, 80-89; a Rejoinder, 173-185 French lyrics by a Belgian poet, 411- enamel-workers, 98-110 690 244 Denmark, Holland, and Great Britain, 26–37 German Social Democracy and the Kaiser, 38-47 Germany, The Naval Policy of, 835– 851 Gill (Rev. H. V.), Sone Recent Earth- DRAMA, National encouragement quake Theories, 144-150 Goffin (Ms) and native labour on the Gordon and the Gladstone Cabinet, Gordon (General) : Gordon (General) and Zobeir Pasha, Government under the party system, Personal KE Party, 18-25 Greek Folklore, Modern, Echoes of Inebriates and the Licensing Bill, 582 the Eleusinian Mysteries in, 651- 594 Infants, Rearing of, Instruction to Profession for Educated Women, In Memoriam : Sir James Knowles, 683-696, 984-986 in, 48-61 787- JES ESSOPP (Dr.), A Great Norfolk Johnston (Sir Harry H.), How to criticised, 386-397 Journalism, The Universities and a School of, 327-340 of, 811-818 of Europe in its Relation EBBEL (T. E.), Parliament and Keene (H. G.), Conflict of Civilisa- tions in India, 1022-1030 Khartoum, The New, 127-132 Knowles (James): a Tribute from some Friends, 683-696, 984-986 Knowles (Sir James), The Gods of Greece, 341 Königsmarck (Count Carl John) and the murder of Thomas Thynne, 272-284 Portugal reviewed, 62–79 ABOUR and Tariff Reform, 178– 185 ing Classes Save?-1 Workman's ideals, 186–198 Ladies' Settlements and parish clergy- Lagden (Sir Godfrey), How to make the Negro Work, 386-397 Lathbury (D. C.), Equality and Church and its Significance, An Lerberghe (Charles van), A Belgian Poet of Yesterday, 411-427 Lord Randolph Churchill's opinions, dolph Churchill as a Tariff Re. former, 354-364 ; The Evolution Party, 869-887 Labour Party, Pro- Liberal Government, The, and its critics, 1-17 drunkards, 582-594 and Licensing Bill, The, Will it Promote Sobriety? 707-721 831-834 Louis XV. and Count Saint-Germain 111-126 6 |