Imatges de pàgina
PDF
EPUB

Great indulgence is due to the errors of original writers, who, quitting the beaten track which others have travelled, make daring incurfions into unexplored regions of invention, and boldly strike into the pathlefs Sublime it is no wonder if they are often bewildered, fometimes benighted: yet furely it is more eligible to partake the pleasure and the hazard of their adventures, than ftill to follow the cautious steps of timid Imitators through trite and common roads. Genius is of a bold enterprizing nature, ill adapted to the formal restraints of critic institutions, or indeed to lay down to itself rules of nice difcretion. If perfect and faultless compofition is ever to be expected from human faculties, it must be at fome happy period, when a noble and graceful fimplicity, the result of well regulated and fober magnanimity, reigns through the general manners. Then the mufes and the arts, neither effeminately delicate, nor audaciously bold, affume their highest character, and in all their compofitions feem to refpect the chastity of the public taste, which would equally disdain quaintness

of

of ornament, or the rude neglect of elegance and decorum. Such periods had Greece, had Rome! Then were produced immortal works of every kind! But, when the living manners degenerated, in vain did an Aristotle and a Quintilian endeavour to restore by doctrine, what had been inspired by sentiment, and fashioned by manners.

If the feverer mufes, whofe fphere is the Library and the Senate, are obliged, in complaifance to this degeneracy, to trick themfelves out with meretricious and frivolous ornaments, as is too apparent from the compofitions of the Hiftorians and Orators in declining empires, can we wonder that a dramatic poet, whose chief interest it is to please the people, should, more than any other writer, conform himself to their humour; and appear more ftrongly infected with the faults of the times, whether they be fuch as belong to unpolished, or corrupted taste?

Shakespear wrote at a time, when learn

ing

ing was tinctured with pedantry, wit was unpolished, and mirth ill-bred. The court of Elizabeth spoke a scientific jargon; and a certain obscurity of ftyle was univerfally affected. James brought an addition of pedantry, accompanied by indecent and indelicate manners and language. By contagion, or from complaifance to the taste of the public, Shakespear falls fometimes into the fashionable mode of writing: but this is only by fits; for many parts of all his plays are written with the most noble, elegant, and uncorrupted fimplicity. Such is his merit, that the more just and refined the taste of the nation is become, the more he has encreased in reputation. He was approved by his own age, admired by the next, and is revered, and almost adored by the present. His merit is disputed by little wits, and his errors are the jefts of little critics; but there has not been a great poet, or great critic, fince his time, who has not spoken of him with the highest veneration, Mr. Voltaire alone excepted; whofe tranflations often, whose criticisms

ftill

ftill oftener, prove he did not perfectly understand the Words of the Author; and therefore it is certain he could not enter into his Meaning. He comprehended enough to perceive that Shakespear was unobfervant of fome established rules of compofition; the felicity, with which he performs what no rules can teach, efcapes him. Will an intelligent fpectator not admire the prodigious ftructures of Stone-Henge, because he does not know by what law of mechanics they were raised? Like them, our author's works will remain for ever the greatest monuments of the amazing force of nature, which we ought to view as we do other prodigies, with an attention to, and admiration of their stupendous parts, and proud irregularity of Greatness.

It has been already declared, that Shakespear is not to be tried by any code of critic laws; nor is it more equitable to judge him entirely by the practice of any particular theatre. Yet fome criterion must be established by which we may determine his

merits.

merits. First, we must take into confideration what is propofed to be done by the means of dramatic imitation. Every species of poetry has its diftinct offices. The effecting certain moral purposes, by the representation of a Fable, feems to have been the univerfal intention, from the first infti'tution of the Drama to this time; and to have prevailed, not only in Europe, but in all countries where the dramatic art has been attempted. It has indeed been the common aim of all poetry to please and instruct; but by means as various as the kinds of compofition. We are pleased with the ode, the elegy, the eclogue; not only for having invention, spirit, elegance, and fuch perfections as are neceffary to recommend any fort of poetry, but we also require that each fhould have its specific merit; the ode, that which conftitutes the perfection of an ode, &c. In thefe views, then, our author is to be examined. First, whether his Fables answer the nobleft end of Fable, moral instruction; next, whether his dramatic imitation has its proper dramatic ex

[ocr errors]

cellence.

« AnteriorContinua »