« AnteriorContinua »
E.rpire before their fashions :--This he wish'd :
You are lov'd, sir; They, that least lend it you, shall lack you first. King. I fill a place, I know't. --How long is't,
Some six months since, my lord.
Thank your majesty.
- their constancies Expire before their fashions.”
TYRWHITT. The reading of the old copy-fathers, is supported by a similar passage in Cymbeline:
some jay of Italy
No, nor thy tailor, rascal,
Which, as it seems, make thee.” There the garment is said to be the father of the man :-in the text, the judgment, being employed solely in forming or giving birth to new dresses, is called the father of the garment. So, in King Henry IV. Part II. :
every minute now “ Should be the father of some stratagem.” Malone.
nature and sickness Debate it -] So, in Macbeth : “ Death and nature do contend about them." STEEVENS.
Rousillon. A Room in the Countess's Palace.
Enter Countess, Steward, and Clown 8. Count. I will now hear: what say you of this gentlewoman?
8 - Steward, and Clown.) A Clown in Shakspeare is commonly taken for a licensed jester, or domestick fool. We are not to wonder that we find this character often in his plays, since fools were at that time maintained in all great families, to keep up merriment in the house. In the picture of Sir Thomas More's family, by Hans Holbein, the only servant represented is Patison the fool. This is a proof of the familiarity to which they were admitted, not by the great only, but the wise.
In some plays, a servant, or a rustic, of a remarkable petulance and freedom of speech, is likewise called a clown. Johnson.
Cardinal Wolsey, after his disgrace, wishing to show King Henry VIII. a mark of his respect, sent him his fool Patch, as a present; whom, says Stowe, “the King received very gladly."
Malone. This dialogue, or that in Twelfth-Night, between Olivia and the Clown, seems to have been particularly censured by Cartwright, in one of the copies of verses prefixed to the works of Beaumont and Fletcher :
Shakspeare to thee was dull, whose best jest lies
“ In trunk-hose, which our fathers call the Clown." In the MS. Register of Lord Stanhope of Harrington, treasurer of the chamber to King James I. from 1613 to 1616, are the following entries : “ Tom Derry, his majesty's fool, at 2s. per diem,-1615: Paid John Mawe for the diet and lodging of Thomas Derrie, her majesty's jester, for 13 weeks, 101. 185. 60.1616." STEEVENS.
The following lines in The Careless Shepherdess, a comedy, 1656, exhibit probably a faithful portrait of this once admired character :
Why, I would have the fool in every act,
Stew. Madam, the care I have had to even your content', I wish might be found in the calendar of my past endeavours; for then we wound our modesty, and make foul the clearness of our deservings, when of ourselves we publish them '.
Count. What does this knave here ? Get gone, sirrah: The complaints, I have heard of you, I do not all believe; 'tis my slowness, that I do not: for, I know, you lack not folly to commit them, and have ability enough to make such knaveries yours
Clo. 'Tis not unknown to you, madam, I am a
Count. Well, sir.
“ To see him hold out his chin, hang down his hands,
About him but breaks jests.-
Johnson. – when of ourselves we publish them.] So, in Troilus and Cressida :
“ The worthiness of praise disdains his worth,
Malone. you lack not folly to commit them, and have ability enough to make such knaveries yours.) After premising that the accusative, them, refers to the precedent word, complaints, and that this, by a metonymy of the effect for the cause, stands for the freaks which occasioned those complaints, the sense will be extremely clear : “ You are fool enough to commit those irregularities you are charged with, and yet not so much fool neither, as to discredit the accusation by any defect in your ability.” Heath.
It appears to me that the accusative them refers to knaveries, and the natural sense of the passage seems to be this : “ You have folly enough to desire to commit these knaveries, and ability enough to accomplish them." M. Mason.
poor ; though many of the rich are damned: But, if I may have your ladyship's good will to go to the world', Isbel the woman and I^ will do as we may.
Count. Wilt thou needs be a beggar ?
Clo. In Isbel's case, and mine own. Service is no heritage : and, I think, I shall never have the blessing of God, till I have issue of my body; for, they say, bearns are blessings.
Count. Tell me thy reason why thou wilt marry.
Clo. My poor body, madam, requires it: I am driven on by the flesh; and he must needs go, that the devil drives.
Count. Is this all your worship's reason ?
Clo. Faith, madam, I have other holy reasons, such as they are.
Count. May the world know them?
Clo. I have been, madam, a wicked creature, as you and all flesh and blood are ; and, indeed, I do marry that I may repent.
Count. Thy marriage, sooner than thy wicked
Clo. I am out of friends, madam ; and I hope to have friends for my wife's sake.
Count. Such friends are thine enemies, knave.
to go to the world,) This phrase has already occurred in Much Ado About Nothing, and signifies to be married : and thus, in As You Like It, Audrey says: “ — it is no dishonest desire, to desire to be a woman of the world." STEEVENS.
and 1-] 1, which was inadvertently omitted in the first copy, was supplied by the editor of the second folio.
Malone. In the first folio, w is put for I. BosweLL.
s Service is no heritage :) This is a proverbial expression. · Needs must when the devil drives,” is another. Ritson.
Clo. You are shallow, madam ; e'en great friends'; for the knaves come to do that for me, which I am a-weary of S. He, that ears my land ',
7 Clo. You are shallow, madam; bien great friends ;] The meaning [i. e. of the ancient reading mentioned in the subsequent note] seems to be, you are not deeply skilled in the character or offices of great friends. Johnson.
The old copy reads—in great friends ; evidently a mistake for e'en, which was formerly written e'n. The two words are so near in sound, that they might easily have been confounded by an inattentive hearer.
The same mistake has happened in many other places in our author's plays. So, in the present comedy, Act III. Sc. II. folio, 1623 :
Lady. What have we here?
“ Clown. In that you have there." Again, in Antony and Cleopatra :
“ No more, but in a woman." Again, in Twelfth-Night:
Tis with him in standing water, between boy and man.” Again, in Romeo and Juliet, 1599 :
Is it in so ?” The corruption of this passage was pointed out by Mr. Tyrwhitt. For the emendation now made, I am answerable.
Malone. the knaves come to do that for me, which I am a-weary of.] The same thought is more dilated in an old MS. play, entitled, The Second Maid's Tragedy:
Soph. I have a wife, would she were so preferr'd !
Marry, his lodging he paies deerly for ;
And keepes 'em nwte; nay more, a husband's sure