* (Investing lank-lean cheeks, and war worn-coats,) Walking from watch to watch, from tent to tent, Let him cry, praife and glory on his head! Upon his royal face there is no note, How dread an army hath enrounded him; giving poffeffion by a robe or vestment: He then obferved, that Shakespear ufes the word in a fimple fense: an investment with him being the matching of cloaths: and cloaths that are well match'd or fuited, are called a fute or fuit of cloaths. And their gefture fad Invefting (i. e. fuiting or matching with) lank-lean cheeks &c: He feems to have fallen into the fame mistake with the other commentators in regard to the conftruction. All I would obferve from his judicious remark is, that invefling, in the metaphorical fenfe, if it fatisfies not the reader in the fimple one, will explain the paflage very well: lank-lean cheeks and war-worn coats taking poffeffion of them, &c. but I think the first sense the true one. I cannot but approve Sir Thomas Hanmer's criticism of presented into prefenteth which I have admitted into the text, as the reader may plainly fee, the chorus fpeaks of the time prefent: they fit, they ruminate, and so on. To make the line more clear, I have printed it in a parenthefis, and, I hope, fhall be excused for my endeavour to explain fo difficult a pafiage, as I would have every line, in our author, if poffible, fet right, and, by all means, prefer the old and general readings, to any wanton conjectures of mifapprehending criticifm. 2 *Prefenteth. Ox, edit, vulg. prefented. His His lib'ral eyes doth give to ev'ry one, Thawing cold fear. SCENE V. The Miferies of Royalty. (9) O hard condition, and twin-born with greatness, And what art thou, thou idol ceremony? (10) What is the foul of adoration! Art thou aught elfe but place, degree, and form, (9) 0, &c.] See A. 4. S. 10, of the foregoing play. (10) What, &c.] What is thy foul of adoration--- is the common reading: there wants but the alteration of thy into the, as in the text, and all is well: the meaning is as well explained by Mr. Upton--what is the foul, i. e. the real worth, what substantial good is there in adoration or ceremony? What are the rents? What are the comings in, Oh ceremony! fhew me but thy worth, tell me what is the foul, the very utmost value, of adoration ?---" ShakeSpear ufes the word foul in this sense very often;--in this play, he says, There is some foul of goodness in things evil; i. e. fome real or substantial good. In his midfummer night's dream But you must join in fouls to mock me too; i. e. unite together heartily, and in earnest. And in Measure for measure; We have with special foul Elected him, &c. i.e particularly and specially speciamente. The alterations foifted into the texts in the feveral places, are too ridiculous to need mentioning: Upton's Obfervations, p. 406. C 4 Creating Creating awe and fear in other men? Wherein thou art lefs happy, being fear'd, Than they in fearing. What drink'st thou oft, inftead of homage sweet, Will it give place to flexure and low bending? Can fleep fo foundly as the wretched flave; Sweats 4 But, like, &c.] The poet in this most beautiful paffage is comparing the laborious flave to the lacquey or footman of Phoebus: "He never beholds night, fays the poet, but like a lacquey obliged ever to attend and follow his mafter, fweats from rife to fet, in the eye of Phoebus, bis mafter, fleeps all night, where be (Phabus) fleeps, in Elyhum, and the next day, after dawn, rifes to his bufinefs, and helps his mafter, Hyperion, to his horfe; in whofe fight he again fweats from rife to fet as before, and thus follows the ever-running year &c." Nothing can be more exquifite, and more nobly befpeak the hand of Shakespear. Mr. Seward's alteration is quite unneceffary; for this manner of expreffion is entirely agreeable Sweats in the eye of Phoebus; and all night Winding up days with toil, and nights with fleep, SCENE VII. A Defcription of the miferable State of the English A my. Yon island carrions, desperate of their bones, With torch-ftaves in their hands: and their poor jades agreeable to our author. That gentleman, in his preface, brings the following paffage from Philafter, A. 4. as worthy to be placed in competition with that of Shakespear, and where the hands, he fays, are scarcely to be diftinguished, except from one fingle expreffion of Shakespear. A prince depriv'd of his throne and betray'd as he thought in love, thus mourns his melancholy ftate. See Beaumont: and Fletcher's works, Vol. 1: preface, p, 24. Oh that I had been nourish'd in thefe woods, C 5 The The gum down-roping from their p le dead eyes; Fly o'er them, all impatient for their hour. SCENE X. K. Henry's Speech before the Battle at Agincourt. He that out-lives this day, and comes fafe home, Will ftand a tip-toe when this day is nam'd: And rouze him at the name of Crifpian : He that out-lives this day, and fees old age, And fay, to-morrow is faint Crifpian : Then will he ftrip his fleeve, and fhew his fcars: Old men forget; yet fhall not all forget, But they'remember, with advantages, What feats they did that day. Then fhall our names, Familiar in their mouth as houfhold words, Harry the king, Bedford, and Exeter, Warwick, and Talbot, Salisbury, and Glo'fter, SCENE XII. Defcription of the Earl of York's * He fmil'd me in the face, gave me his hand, And, with a feeble gripe, fays, dear my lord, Commend. (11) Fymold Jymold, or rather gimma'd, which fignifies a ring of two rounds, Gemellus, Skinner. Mr. Pope. *He fmil'd, &c] This tender and pathetic defcription of the earl of York's death always reminds me of Virgil's celebrated epifode on the friendship of Nifus and Euryalus, who fell undivided in death, and lovely as they had lived---Euryalus was wounded when his fiiend rush'd to his affiftance, and begg'd his life: the.poet tells us ; In vain he fpoke, for ah, the fword addreft With ruthless rage, had pierc'd his lovely breaft, * Nifus. With |