Imatges de pàgina
PDF
EPUB

country has been subjected; but the opi- | the lowest point at which they could be nion of one of the King's ministers has proposed. He proposed to the committee been given as to the probable termination a detailed estimate of the peace establishof those engagements. That term, it is ment, at a time when we had no ally in said, will soon arrive; and when the result Europe, when even Holland was torn from of the negociations is laid before your us, and France was more flourishing in lordships, this one point must be discussed wealth and power than she now is-the either conjointly with the general ques- amount was less than five millions and a tion of those negociations, or separately, as half! After an experience of five years occasion may require; and I shall then he was inclined to believe that the first submit to your lordships the extreme im- estimate had reduced the establishments policy of employing British troops in the below their proper amount; and in the different parts where they have been same plain and intelligible mode in which maintained, and particularly in the Ne- he proposed the first establishment, he therlands. produced a detailed account on which an establishment of six millions only was founded. He did not rest there, but after seven years of peace, in 1792, when the manufactures and commerce of the country had begun again to be most flourishing, he proposed a reduction of 200,000l.; and your lordships will remember, that these different establishments were not in estimate merely, but that the supply of the year 1792 was actually less than six millions. I must beg your lordships to cast your eyes on the present situation of the country, and its situation in 1792, and imagine what any one who had taken part in the measures I have mentioned, must feel at hearing that any man could propose (for that it can be acquiesced in is impossible), that the peace establishment of this country should be 19 millions a year! I see no reason for any considerable increase of the peace establishment beyond that of 1792. It is true there is a necessity of garrisoning two or three towns, which we had not then; but it can be proved that a necessity does not exist to provide any additional force, except for perhaps one of them. The others are of that nature, that the additional security they afford to other possessions will require no increase, but will authorize a diminution of force. I allude to the East Indies, where a considerable reduction of force will be required, which will cover any increase which may be made in other places. But though the force necessary be the same, I allow that for maintaining that force the expense must be greater. The pay of the troops has been increased; a boon in granting which I readily concurred, and which I would not consent to withdraw. On the pay of the officers an increase has been made, which I believe is absolutely necessary. It is not, therefore, possible to reduce the peace ́establishment exactly to the same sum at

The other motion it is still less necessary to explain. Whatever may be our policy as to the extent of the military establishment of the country, this is certain, that the House should know what efforts have been made, after ten or twelve months of peace, to reduce the expenditure of the country in that branch in which it most loudly calls for reduction-the different staff establishments maintained at home and abroad. The result I shall not anticipate. But if before this day I was anxious to know the result, my anxiety has been How increased to a degree which I can hardly describe. The necessity of a peace establishment, and of putting the military part of it down to the lowest level to which by any possibility it can be reduced, is obvious; and I am prepared to show on what grounds the army might be reduced in point of establishment, if not in point of expense, to the level in which it stood when the late unfortunate contest commenced. But now, from the reports which have been spread abroad, I learn that the question is not what the peace establishment shall be, but whether we ever shall have a peace establishment? I have been told that there was an individual capable of proposing, and an assembly of English gentlemen who had endured to hear of a peace establishment of 19 millions a year. A peace establishment of 19 millions a year! I have not had the opportunity of consulting official documents, from the short time since I have heard the report I have alluded to; but by a statement which I have seen, I have every reason to believe the report is correct. Do your lordships know what was the amount of the peace establishment at the close of the American war? The great and upright man who then was at the head of the finances of the country, felt it his duty to reduce the establishments to

expensive. The expense entailed on the country was enormous; but the faith of the country was pledged to the arrangements on that subject, some of which, made by the administration of the noble lord (Grenville), were neither wise nor expedient. It was not to be supposed, however, that with all the colonies we were possessed of, the same military force as that of 1792, would be sufficient. Some military force was also necessary to secure internal tranquillity, and to maintain the character of the nation. The House would be much better qualified to judge on the subject after a full examination of the estimates that would be laid before them; though he admitted there was no subject on which the House should be more jealous, than that which respected the amount of our establishments in time of peace.

which it was fixed in 1792; but the amount of force may be the same, or nearly the same, though the expense of maintaining that force may be varied by the circumstances of the times. I shall not pursue the details of the subject; but I thought it would not be consistent with my duty, if, after bearing such a report as has been spread abroad, I did not on the first meeting of your lordships call your attention to the dreadful purpose which is harboured of making this nation a great military power. We cannot disguise the fact. No one can have proposed a peace establishment of 19 millions but with the intention of changing the constitution of the country in such sort, that it shall no longer continue a free country-to make this nation rank among the great military nations of Europe. On this question probably your lordships will The Marquis of Lansdowne accepted the have session after session to decide; but pledge of the noble earl, that before they if that political establishment is effected, I were called on to accede to any proposhall cease to take a part in the business sitions for increasing the ordinary peace of this House, and to keep up the forms of establishment, the House should have a debate. For if a large military establish- complete opportunity of investigating the ment is permanently kept up-if this expense of the several departments. As nation becomes a military power-we the motion was not objected to, he should must of necessity cease to be a free, and, merely join with his noble friend in proconsequently, a happy people. His lord-testing against any event which might ship concluded by moving for the statements mentioned in his speech.

The Earl of Liverpool, in reply, stated, that the subsidiary engagements with all the powers had terminated at the beginning of October last; with Austria, Prussia, and Spain, two months before: the subsidies having been limited to a time deemed sufficient to enable those powers to march their forces back to their respective countries, after the close of the war. As to the maintenance of troops in the Nether. lands, the fact was admitted, and would be brought by the papers moved for, to which he had no objection, before the House. It was premature to enter then on the discussion of the subject; but he pledged himself to prove, not only that the arrangement was wise, but that it had actually been productive of beneficial consequences. As to the peace establishment, he should lay the fullest information before the House, and should court investigation on all branches, and take all measures to make them as little burthensome as possible. But it was to be considered that a great increase had taken place in the pay of all departments of the service, which would render an establishment on the same scale as that of 1792 much more

tend to change the military system of the country. As the time would soon come for explaining the reasons for keeping up so large a force on the continent, it would be necessary to justify that measure, that it should be shown to have been done for British objects alone, and that the consequence would not be to involve the country in a connexion with the continent. If any change was to be effected in the military system of the country, he hoped the parliament would be called on to do it with its eyes open, and not be drawn incidentally or hurried by precipitation into change.

The motions were agreed to.

HOUSE OF COMMONS.

Tuesday, February 21.

STATE OF THE STREETS OF THE METROPOLIS.] Mr. M. A. Taylor rose to call the attention of the House to a public grievance, which, in his opinion, required both immediate remedy and future precaution. The only question, he apprehended, would be as to the nature of that remedy; for the evil of which he complained was indisputable and universally felt, yet without the interference of parliament would

advertisements, and to appoint an inspector for each district, whose salaries, with those of a few clerks, would constitute the whole expense of his measure. The salary of the inspector ought to be, be conceived, not less than 500l. per annum, as he should be a person of uncorrupt character, and removable by the commissioners. It was his intention, if the House gave him leave to bring in the Bill, further to propose, that the Bill should become operative three months after its passing into a law. It was a measure which could inflict no hardship on the parishes, whose duty it was already by law to prevent all nuisances in the public streets. He should also introduce a com

restraining them from taking up any pavement at their own pleasure, or from laying down any other than iron pipes in future, as well as to limit their right of breaking up a street to a particular period of the year. It was obvious that it was an evil chiefly experienced in the winter season. The inspector must be armed with the power of levying fines, either on the parish, or the authors of the mischief, and

probably remain unredressed. He wished to submit to the House the necessity that existed of preserving the pavements of the metropolis in such a state as should not endanger the safety of his Majesty's subjects. Many accidents had already occurred in consequence of the manner in which they were at present broken up; and not long since a coachman had been thrown from his box, and killed on the spot. He had been told, in the course of his inquiries into the cause of this shameful disorder and negligence, that it was an evil which it was impossible to prevent. This impossibility, however, he was determined to try, and would persevere at the risk of giving offence to the parish officers, and even though the water compulsory clause on the water companies, panies should put him in their reservoirs, or the gas-light company into their furnaces. The city of London, he knew, was exempted by charter; but he trusted, that when they saw a proper system of inspection and control established in Westminster, they would think it worth their attention to imitate the example. With respect to the law as it already stood, there was no distinction between streets and highways, the former being so deno-in proportion to the extent of the evil, minated only from their running through subject to the revision of the commissioninhabited and populous places. They ers. He should also propose that these were indictable at quarter sessions, and it provisions might equally extend to the was the duty of the magistrates to assess gas-light companies, and the commisa sufficient rate, and direct the parochial sioners of sewers, and that they should all overseers to institute the proper repairs. be interdicted from laying down wooden The law, then, was entirely with him; pipes in future. He did not wish to inbut it was too dilatory in its application, terfere with the rivalship of different comand required the quickening energy of panies; no man was a greater enemy to parliament to give it its due and salutary monopoly than himself; his only object effect. The law guaranteed every man's was to secure to the public what they had title to the terra firma, and on him who a right to possess-a good, safe, and comobstructed or undermined it imposed the modious carriage-road. The fact was, obligation of fully and completely repair- the pavements, after being so opened, were ing the mischief he had occasioned. The not laid down again sometimes for months, streets of Paris were not subject to this and without some quick and compulsory inconvenience; and those of Edinburgh, measure, he was convinced the evil would and from that to Leith, were equally safe continue to exist. He was sorry he could and beautiful, forming an inclined plane, not compliment the right hon. the Chanand enabling carriages to proceed with cellor of the Exchequer, whom he then equal convenience and velocity. What saw in his place, on the condition of the he now proposed was, to bring in a Bill streets near the Treasury. From thence enabling the crown to appoint a board of to Scotland-yard their state was disgracecommissioners, and to divide the metro-ful as well as dangerous. On inquiring polis into four or five districts. These at the Treasury on this, subject, he had commissioners were to act gratuitously, and to be composed of gentlemen resident in the particular district over which they presided, and to possess, as a qualification, 300l. a year, or 10,000l. in money. They were to be called on to publish proper

been told that the cause was, there was no money there [a laugh]; but he trusted the right hon. gentleman would not support such an assertion. He should now move for leave to bring in a Bill for the purposes he had mentioned, and could

[ocr errors]

assure the House that nothing would give him greater satisfaction than the introduction of some measure better calculated than that of which he had just submitted the outlines, to accomplish the object he had in view

—————si quid novisti rectius istis,

⚫ Candidus imperti: si non, his utere mecum.' The hon. gentleman concluded with moving, "That leave be given to bring in a Bill for the better paving of the streets of the metropolis."

Mr. Calvert inquired whether it was the hon. member's intention to include the borough of Southwark in the provisions of his Bill, as he conceived its streets rather deserved the eulogy passed on those of Edinburgh, than the censure on those in the neighbourhood of the Treasury.

deducted, and 250,000l. would be the sum required. To purchase the ground necessary for altering the present office, in Lombard-street, would require 260,000l.; so that, as the estimates were nearly equal, the improvement and ornament of the city ought to decide in favour of the new situation.

Leave was given to bring in the Bill.

COURTS OF JUSTICE.] Sir John Newport rose to move for leave to bring in a Bill to impower the commissioners appointed to examine into the fees of the courts of justice, to compel the attendance of witnesses to be examined on that inquiry. He contended that such powers were necessary, particularly in a case like the present. It had been stated, on a former evening, that the officers of the courts could not refuse to give evidence before the commissioners; yet it was manifest that without such a bill as he proposed there was no compulsion on them to attend, while no persons were more likely to wish for concealment than those whose conduct was to be examined into. Besides, others must be examined, as ex

Mr. Taylor replied, that in a bill of this nature, it was impossible to except any particular district; but if Southwark required no inspection, it would become liable to no expense. The expense already borne by the metropolis was immense, not less than 150,000l. per annum, while that of his Bill would be no more than 2,3001. Leave was then given to prepare and parte statements would not be fully to be bring in the Bill.

NEW POST-OFFICE.] Sir James Shaw moved for leave to bring in a Bill for improving the West end of Cheapside, St. Martin's-le-Grand, &c. and for providing a site in that part of the town for a New Post-office.

Mr. Grenfell declared, that the objections formerly urged against the propriety of changing the site of the Post-office, as being attended with an expense of 800,000l. were founded on a misconception of the amount required, either for the purpose of a removal, or of altering and improving the present office, to render it adequate for the fulfilment of the duties of that department. He had carefully calculated the expenses of both, and found them to be nearly equal. As the circumstance of expense was therefore removed, the point to be considered was, the increase of ornament and advantage the city would derive from the proposed change. The compensation for the property to be purchased in Cheapside, St. Martin's-leGrand, &c. he estimated at 150,000l.; the expenses of erecting the office would be 140,000l.; making an aggregate of 290,000l. From this let 40,000%. (the price of the materials of the present office) be

relied on. It had been the constant practice to arm committees with powers to compel attendance, and he could see no reason why those powers should not be necessary on this as well as on any other occasion. As one instance, he would allude to the Carnatic commissioners, who were armed with such powers. The details of his Bill would be liable to future discussion; but to the principle of it, he did not see how there could be any objection. He therefore moved, "That leave be given to bring in a Bill to enable the commissioners appointed, or to be appointed by royal commission, to examine into the state of the courts of 'justice of Great Britain and Ireland, to compel the attendance of witnesses upon them, and their disclosure of all such matters respecting the same, as may be within their knowledge, and under such regulations as would be adopted in a court of law."

Mr. Bathurst contended, that there was no occasion for such a Bill as was proposed by the right hon. baronet. The commissioners appointed in 1732 had acted without any such powers, and yet they went on in accomplishing the objects entrusted to them. The instance alluded to was very widely different from the present

case; for the Carnatic question was one of abuses in general. This was not an inquiry into general abuses, but one into fees actually taken, about which there could be no secret. The right hon. baronet did not state any abuses in any department but in the master's office, and surely the master of that office would not refuse, for his own character's sake, to give evidence on every thing on which he should be examined by the commission. The right hon, baronet seemed to attack the entire body of the magistracy, as if unwilling to give evidence; or why make a law to compel them to give it? On the whole, he saw no necessity whatever for the Bill, and would therefore move the previous question.

Mr. W. Smith spoke in favour of the Bill; because it was hardly to be supposed that persons who were parties to those abuses which the commissioners were appointed to detect, who had either committed them, connived at them, or tempted others to commit them, would voluntarily come forward and disclose them. It might be true that the commissioners of 1732 had no such powers; but was that a reason why in 1815 such powers should not be granted if it was found necessary? A strong inducement to concealment on this occasion was voluntary attendance: for a person, who would draw on himself much anger from his superiors in office for giving information in such a case, could not be at all blamed, if his giving information were compulsory. This was a question of mere common sense. If it was necessary to give the commissioners such powers as the Bill required, to obtain information, how could the House refuse them? He, for his part, thought the powers were indispensably necessary, and would therefore vote for the Bill.

Sir John Simeon hoped, that the right hon. baronet, in his remarks in a former debate, on the masters in Chancery, did not mean to insinuate, that they committed, individually, any of those offences of office which were now visited by his indignation. He believed, that if the right hon. baronet had known the body of the masters, he would acknowledge them to be most honourable in the discharge of their public duty. Had the right hon. baronet ever known a case, among the many abuses he has learned, where a complaint had been made to the masters and not attended to? He could with confidence defy him to produce it.

It could not for a moment be imagined, that any men of liberal feelings could be induced, for a paltry fee, to render their honour suspected, or their characters liable to imputation. He declared, that if on the first motion for this commission he had been present, no motives of false delicacy would have prevented him, as it did his hon. friend opposite (Mr. Stephen), from repelling, with indignation, the slightest breath of suspicion affecting the characters of the body of masters.

Mr. Horner did not think the panegyric pronounced upon himself and the other masters of Chancery by the hon. and learned gentleman any answer to the observation of his hon. friend. The House had already resolved that an inquiry should take place; and the only question now to be considered was, whether this inquiry should be effectual, or the intention of the House last session should be frustrated or eluded. Mr. Horner asserted, that according to the information he had received, several officers of these courts had acted in a most unjustifiable manner, by creating of their own authority fees which not only were not authorized by the judges of these courts, but were expressly contrary to an act of parliament. He did not know who the commissioners were that had been appointed in Ireland; but there was an instance in Scotland, where the person named as a commissioner was the very man who had for twenty years acted as the chief officer of the court in which all the abuses complained of had arisen, and been put in continual practice. He thought it very extraordinary that any objection should be made to give the power now required to the commissioners, to summon witnesses to give evidence on oath; because, without such a power, the appointment of commissioners appeared to him to be nugatory. If the right hon. gentleman should succeed in resisting this motion, he had no doubt but that all future endeavours to check the abuses complained of would prove fruitless.

The Attorney General said, he must resist the present motion. The commissioners were gentlemen of most approved good character; and if they shewed the smallest dereliction of their duty, they would forfeit that high distinction which their previous conduct had obtained. His hon. and learned friend who spoke last, had complained, that persons had been appointed commissioners to inquire into

« AnteriorContinua »