Madras High Court Reports: 1874 and 1875J. Higgingbotham, 1876 |
Frases i termes més freqüents
1st defendant 1st defendant's 2nd defendant 3rd defendant Acting District Judge agreement Akbar Sahib alleged Ammal ancestral Appellate Jurisdiction application appointed arbitrators award Bade Sahib barred brother Chetty claim co-parcener Collector costs Court delivered dated death debts decision decree deed delivered the following dismissed dispute District Munsif Durai Pandien entitled evidence execution father grant ground heir held High Court Hindu Law illegitimate inheritance issue January 29 judgment July 9 Justice Kindersley Limitation Act Lower Court Madras H. C. Rep Madras High Court Mahé maintenance March 19 ment minor Moore's I. A. Morgan mortgage November October 19 opinion Original Suit Padamathoor parties payment person plaint plaintiff polliaput possession present Present-Sir primogeniture Privy Council Proceedings provisions purchase question razinamah referred registered Regular Appeal rent rule Rupees Section Shevagunga Sithappah South Arcot Special Appeal Subordinate Judge succeed Sudra Sujjadah Tanjore tion undivided vakil villages widow Zemindary
Passatges populars
Pàgina 196 - When registered, they shall bind the company and the members thereof to the same extent as if each member had subscribed his name and affixed his seal thereto, and there were in such articles contained a covenant on the part of himself, his heirs, executors and administrators, to conform to all the regulations contained in such articles, subject to the provisions of this act...
Pàgina 82 - Where in any matter relating to a ship or to a person belonging to a ship there appears to be a conflict of laws, then, if there is in this Part of this Act any provision on the subject which is hereby expressly made to extend to that ship, the case shall be governed by that provision; but if there is no such provision, the case shall be governed by the law of the port at which the ship is registered.
Pàgina 81 - ... and also, at the discretion of the court, to forfeit out of his wages a sum not exceeding two days...
Pàgina 124 - The question is not, whether she knew what she was doing, had done or proposed to do, but how the intention was produced, whether all that care and providence was placed around her, as against those, who advised her, which, from their situation and relation with respect to her, they were bound to exert on her behalf.
Pàgina 192 - Act ; but an unregistered company shall not, except in the event of its being wound up, be deemed to be a company under this Act, and then only to the extent provided by this part of this Act (a).
Pàgina 174 - Their Lordships think that the question, on whom does the onus of proof lie in such suits as the present, is one not capable of a general and inflexible answer. The presumption proper to be made will vary with circumstances, and must be regulated by, and dependent on, them. Thus, where the mortgagee himself, with whom the transaction took place, is setting up a charge in his favour made by one whose title to alienate he necessarily knew to...
Pàgina 40 - is the loss by unlawful means of property to which the person losing it is legally entitled.
Pàgina 196 - ... thereto, and there were in such articles contained a covenant on the part of himself, his heirs, executors, and administrators, to conform to all the regulations contained in such articles, subject to the provisions of this Act ; and all moneys payable by any member to the company...
Pàgina 174 - But the dictum , there, though general, must be read in connection with the facts of that case. It : might be a very correct course to adopt with reference to suits of that particular character, which was one where the sons of a living father were, with his suspected collusion, attempting, in a suit against a creditor, to get rid of the charge on an ancestral estate created by the father, on the ground of the alleged misconduct of the father in extravagant waste of the estate.
Pàgina 11 - Council, every Son who is born becomes upon his birth entitled to an interest in the undivided ancestral property. In such a case, neither the Father nor any of the Sons can, at any particular moment, say what share he will be entitled to when partition takes place. The shares to which the members of a joint family would be entitled on partition are constantly varying by births, deaths, marriages, &c. ; and the principle of the Mitacshera law seems to be, that no sharer before partition can, without...