 | Parliament lords, proc - 1747 - 520 pągines
...Queftion was put, that no Patent Contents 57 of Honour granted to any Peer of NotCont. 52 Great-Britain, who was a Peer of Scotland at the Time of the Union,...Trials of Peers ? It was refolved in. the Affirmative. Di/entient' iji, Becaufe, as we apprehend, by this Refolution, the Prerogative of the Crown in granting... | |
 | Great Britain. Parliament. House of Lords - 1748 - 282 pągines
...TheQueftion was put, that no Patent Contents 57 of Honour granted to any Peer of NotCont. 5Z -Great-Britain, who was a Peer of Scotland at the Time of the Union, can intitle fach Peer to fit and vote in Parliament, or to fit upon the Trials of Peers ? It was refolved in the... | |
 | Great Britain. Parliament. House of Lords - 1767 - 396 pągines
...matter, , • The queftion was put, that no paContents 57 tent of honour granted to any NotCont,52 peer of Great Britain, who was a peer of Scotland,...trials of peers ? It was refolved in the affirmative. DifTentient', i ft, Becaufe, as we apprehend, by this refblution, the prerogative of the crown in granting... | |
 | John Almon - 1767 - 398 pągines
...concerning the matter, The queftion was put, that no paContents 57 tent of honour granted to any Not Cont,52 peer of Great Britain, who was a peer of Scotland, at the time of the union, can in title fuch peer to fit and vote in parliament, or to fit upon the trials of peers ? It was refolved... | |
 | Great Britain. Court of Chancery - 1787 - 848 pągines
...Decembrii. ten a cm it was refolved by the lords, "that no patent of i7n. ' " honour granted to any peer of Great Britain who was a " peer of Scotland at the tint'* of the union," ihould intitle him *o fit in parliament. Duke of This refolution was founded... | |
 | Richard Wooddeson - 1792 - 532 pągines
...the lords, in the cafe of the duke of Hamilton and Brandon, that no patent of honour granted to any peer of Great Britain, who was a peer of Scotland at the time of the union, fhould entitle him to fit in parliament. This doctrine was adhered to in the following ' cafe. The... | |
 | William Blackstone - 1793 - 686 pągines
...it was refolved by the lords on the 2Oth of December 1711, that no patent of honour granted to any peer of Great Britain, who was a peer of Scotland at the time of the union, fhould entitle him to fit in parliament. Notwithftanding this refolution gave great offence, to the... | |
 | William Blackstone - 1800 - 678 pągines
...it was refolved by the lords on the 2oth of December 1711, that no patent of honour granted to any peer of Great Britain, who was a peer of Scotland at the time of the union, fhould entitle him to ii'i in parliament. Notvvithftanding this refolution gave great offence to the... | |
 | Sir William Blackstone - 1807 - 686 pągines
...it was resolved by the lords on the 20th of December 1711, that no patent of honour granted to any peer of Great Britain, who was a peer of Scotland at the time of the union, should entitle him to sit in parliament. Notwithstanding this resolution gave great offence to the... | |
 | John Adolphus - 1818 - 560 pągines
...refolved in the cafe of the Duke of Hamilton and Brandon, " that no " patent of honour granted to any peer of Great Britain who " was a peer of Scotland, at the time of the union, fhould " entitle him to fit and vote in parliament, or upon the trial of " peers." And the fame doctrine... | |
| |
Britain, when the lords declared by a majority of five, that no patent of honour granted to any peer of Great Britain, who was a peer of Scotland at the time of the Union, entitled such peer to sit and vote in parliament, or to sit upon the trial of peers. 
