« AnteriorContinua »
"short or long-a system which, in its operation, presses unduly and heavily upon the managers of "those theatres at which new pieces of one and two "acts are frequently produced under the sanction "of the Lord Chancellor's license. In this view of "the subject we are fully borne out by the opinion "of the Select Committee of the House of Commons on dramatic literature, whose report to that House, "in the month of July 1832, upon the subject of "the fees on licenses, was as follows: Your Com"mittee would recommend some revision in the
PROPOSED SCALE OF FEES.
present system of fees to the censor, so (for in""stance) that the license of a song, and the license "of a play, may not be indiscriminately subject to "the same charge.'
Having fully considered this subject, we are in“duced to recommend to your Majesty's considera❝tion, that the following would be a fair and proper "scale of fees, to be in future payable to the ex"aminer upon licensing all theatrical entertain"ments, namely
"For a License for every Dramatic piece of three or more "acts
"For a License for every Dramatic piece of one or two "acts, or for a Pantomime containing prose or poetry 1 0 "For a License for a Song, Address, Prologue, or
"The death of Mr. Colman having caused a va"cancy in the appointment of examiner, the Lord "Chamberlain has stated that his successor has been
GUIDE TO MANAGERS.
appointed, with a distinct understanding that the "scale of fees would be subject to revision. We "consider that the scale proposed by us will afford "a fair and adequate remuneration for the office, provided the salary now payable to the examiner "of plays under your Majesty's warrant is increased "to the extent of about 50l. per annum.'
These extracts will serve as a guide for any distressed manager to know how to steer in cases of doubt or difficulty; they will show what has been paid, and what is, at least for the present, expected to be paid: the most important part of the business after all, because he can then easily ascertain what "extracts will be made from his own unfortunate pocket.
Seven shillings and four shillings versus cleanliness and dirt;scale of both-Reform dinner-Interpretation of initials-Mr. C. Kemble and Washington Irving-Mr. Mathews and the tooth-pick-Contrast between the American and British stage-Dollars and pounds-Fair Rosamond and unfair treatment-Wide distinction between a good pleader and a bad judge-Petition to Parliament-Mr. Duncombe and the Chancellor of the Exchequer-An execution, and if possible a worse case of suspense-A den of thieves and a house of prayer— French actresses-How to engage them-A Clarendon dinner, and a jewel of a desert-The result of all dealings with women.
My humble opinion upon the question of lowering the prices of the two patent theatres has been slightly disposed of in a preceding part of this work: but as we are now arrived at that particular juncture when the reduction, previously carried into effect at Covent Garden, compelled its adoption at Drury Lane, it is necessary to enter into it more minutely. Notwithstanding the attractions previously enumerated, and nightly exhibiting at the latter house, we were literally beaten clean out of the field in receipt-for although to a very successful pantomime were superadded the new ballet (Du
vernay deemed a host in herself) and other popular
CHEAPNESS versus CLEANLINESS.
LIGHT OF OTHER DAYS FADED.
which evening, with a sigh for departed glory, I left the theatre with the feelings I presume a person to have who has done an action of which he is ashamed. The veriest cur who sneaks away with his tail between his legs, from the lash of the whip that has just clung round his loins, never cut a more contemptible figure in his own eyes. I never troubled myself about what others thought. My own mortification was quite enough to contend with. "The light of other days" was "faded" indeed, and I cursed the song, and myself for having written it. True it is, that the theatre which, until the said 31st, had been a comparative desert, was now crowded to the roof, and the wiseacres who urged me on, malgré moi, to this desecration, imagined that a splendid fortune would be speedily realised. The result was precisely what I anticipated—many more people came to the theatre, but its treasury was not the gainer. The lowering the prices did not make one proselyte. It only induced some who at the former price came but once, now to come twicę; and the property was therefore minus in respectability and income. On the principle, however, laid down by that high authority in figures, the Chancellor of the Exchequer, let us submit to the examination of the reader a return of the first week of this innovation, (by some degrees the best week,) and compare it with the corresponding week of the year before at the old prices, and with the same week of the year after, at the present prices :