 | Isaac Watts - 1807 - 320 pàgines
...agree to the middle term, it docs not follow by any means that they disagree with one another. Rule IV. If one of the premises be negative, the conclusion must be negative. For if the middle term be denied of either part of the conclusion, it may shew that the terms of the... | |
 | Isaac Watts - 1813 - 616 pàgines
...agree to the middle term, it does not follow by any means that they disagree from one another. IV. " If one of the premises be negative, the conclusion must be negative." For if live middle term be denied of either part of the conclusion, it may slmv that the terms of the... | |
 | Hezekiah G. Ufford - 1823 - 200 pàgines
...term, (as is here supposed,) it can by no means follow that they disagree with one another. RULE IV. If one of the premises be negative, the conclusion must be negative. For if the middle term be denied of either part of the conclusion, it may show that the terms of the... | |
 | Bombay (India : State). Board of Education - 1851 - 768 pàgines
...another, anil consequently, if we have two negative premises we cannot draw the conclusion. 6th, — If one of the premises be negative the conclusion must be negative, for if it not be it violates the second canon. GANPAT MADOWJI. 5. Q. How many moods are possible? —... | |
 | Euclid - 1853 - 176 pàgines
...no conclusion can be drawn. 4. A negative conclusion cannot follow from two affirmative premises. 5. If one of the premises be negative, the conclusion must be negative; and if one of the premises be particular, the conclusion must be particular. 6. Frdm two particular... | |
 | John Daniel Morell - 1857 - 102 pàgines
...weaker part. That is, if one of the premises be particular, the conclusion must be particular : and if one of the premises be negative, the conclusion must be negative also. The first arises from the laws of sub-alternation, which does not allow us to conclude any thing... | |
 | Victor Doublet - 1868 - 164 pàgines
...either rich or poor. RULE 8. — The conclusion always follows the weaker part. That is to say : — 1. If one of the premises be negative, the conclusion must be negative. For if the middle term be denied of either part of the conclusion, it may show that the terms of the... | |
 | Oxford handbook - 1880 - 36 pàgines
...distributed in one of the premises. 5. If both premises be negative, no conclusion can be drawn. 6. If one of the premises be negative, the conclusion must be negative. 7. If both premises be particular, no conclusion can be drawn. 8. If one premise be particular, the... | |
 | John Neville Keynes - 1884 - 436 pàgines
...Consequently both the terms as to which the conclusion is to be drawn enter partially, and the conclusion can only be a particular affirmative proposition. But if one of the premisses be negative, the conclusion must be negative. This contradiction shews that the supposition... | |
 | James Welton - 1896 - 504 pàgines
...to be drawn enter partially, and " the conclusion (Rule IV) can only be a particular affirma" live proposition. But if one of the premises be negative, " the conclusion must be negative (Rule VI). This contra" diction shows that the supposition of particular premises " producing a legitimate... | |
| |
... must be affirmative, and, being particular, neither of its terms is universal. Consequently both the terms as to which the conclusion is to be drawn enter partially, and the conclusion (Rule 2) can only be a particular affirmative proposition. But... 
