« AnteriorContinua »
167. In conjugating compound verbs formed with prepositions, the augment and reduplication do not change their position, but are inserted between the preposition and the root; as, vuurt, ist pret. of नी, with परि; उपाविशं, 1st pret. of विश्, with उप; अन्वतिष्ठं, Ist pret. of स्था, with अनु; प्रतिजधान, 2d pret. of हन्, with प्रति ; प्रोजहार, 2d pret. of , with # and a.
168. Grammarians restrict certain roots to particular voices, when in combination with particular prepositions ; as, for example, the root fet, "to conquer,” with fa, and the root fast,“ to enter," with fa, are restricted to the ātmanepada; but no certain rules can be propounded on this subject: and in the two epic poems especially, the choice of voice seems so entirely arbitrary and subservient to the purposes of metre, that many ātmanepada primitive, and even passive verbs, are occasionally permitted to take a parasmaipada inflection.
Compound Verbs formed by combining Adverbs with the Roots
कृ भू. 169. These are of two kinds ; Ist, those formed by combining adverbs with 7 and 4; 2dly, those formed by combining nouns used adverbially with these roots. Examples of the first kind are, अलङ्क, " to adorn "; wifacy,“ to make manifest" (cf. note, p. 15.); afsluga, “to eject"; gcei, “to place in front
to place in front” “follow "; fagia, to deprive "; Fri, “to entertain as a guest"; FHET, “ to revere "; HT, HICE,“ to become manifest,” &c.
170. In forming the second kind, the final of a crude word being a or ā, is changed to ī; as, from , umira, “to make ready ;' from graut, quuigi, “to blacken "; or, in a few cases, to ā, as f44ra from fury. A final i or u are lengthened ; as, from fe, yet, " to become pure "; from my, coneg,“ to lighten.” A final ri is
* There are a few exceptions to this rule in the Mahābhārata ; as in whic (Prof. Johnson's Ed. p. 33.).
† Thus, 07,“ to strive,” and gie,“ to beg for,” which are properly ātmanepada verbs, are found in the paras. Instances of passive verbs have been given at p. 89. note f. On the other hand, Toc, “to rejoice," which is properly a parasmaipada verb, is found in the atm.
changed to trī; as, from ATĮ, ATT,“ to become a mother." A final as becomes either ī, as, from gaat, gaat“ to be of good mind "'; or así, as, from free, forcalet, "to place on the head."
a. But the greater number of compounds of this kind are formed from crude nouns in a. The following are other examples : quitai, , “ to esteem as a straw"; pantga, “to stiffen "; vafaat,“ to fix the mind on one object.”
b. Sometimes Hra, placed after a crude noun, is used to form a compound verb of this kind; as, from , " water,"
जलसाकृ, reduce to liquid "; from what, “ashes,” wheti,“ to reduce to ashes."
Sect. III.--COMPOUND ADVERBS (CORRESPONDING TO
171. Compound adverbs are formed by combining adverbs, prepositions, or adverbial prefixes with nouns in the singular number neuter gender.
a. The greater number are formed with the adverbial preposition # saha, contracted into # sa; as, from ea, "anger," wald, “angrily "; from WIGO, respect," Hiçi,“ respectfully"; from 91941,"prostration of the limbs,” HET IT, “reverentially." As, however, the neuter of all adjectives may be used adverbially, these compound adverbs may be regarded as the neuter of the fifth form of relative compounds (r. 161.).
b. The following may be taken as examples of compound adverbs formed with other prefixes: wg.38, “according to seniority”; AMÉ, “over every limb "; HTC, “every month "; 791fafy, “according to rule "; f, or arani, “according to one's power "; qje,“ happily "; FAX,“ before the eyes” (being substituted for ufa, cf. p. 165. 6.); wünt, “undoubtedly "; fara grů, “ without distinction.”
c. Some of the adverbs at r. 139. may be placed after crude nouns; thus, alo, Haiti, “near the child "; we, “for the sake of protection.”
d. A kind of compound adverb is formed by doubling a noun, lengthening the final of the first word, and changing the final of the last to i; as, from us, a stick,” gibiçfits, “mutual striking.”
e. Complex compound adverbs, involving other compounds, are sometimes found; as, E. farástay, “not differently from one's own house"; स्तनभरविनमन्मध्यभङ्गानपेक्षं, “ regardlessly of the curving of her waist bending under the weight of her bosom."
f. The indec. part. wma, “having begun,” is joined with wet, to day” (WETA), in the sense of “from this time forward." Hafa is placed adverbially after words, in the same sense ; as, Tufa, “ from birth upwards."
STRIVE as we may, it is impossible to free the orthographical and etymological part of Sanscrit Grammar from a certain degree of intricacy and complexity. But admitting, as we do, this complexity in the early part of the subject to be greater than is ordinarily found, we at the same time affirm, that, in the aggregate calculation, the preponderance of difficulty is on the side of the classical languages. When the student has once thoroughly mastered the rules relating to the combination of letters and the inflection of nouns and verbs, the path, in Sanscrit, becomes easy to him, and he passes with the utmost certainty to a complete acquaintance with the subject in all its bearings. Not so in Greek or Latin. At the point in Sanscrit where our labours end, at that point in the others do our real labours begin; and the young scholar, however versed in the declension of nouns and conjugation of verbs, finds, when he enters upon the syntax of these two languages, that he has hardly passed the threshold of his studies. is in the syntax of Greek and Latin that the true test of scholarship lies.
It is here that an almost interminable field of inquiry opens before the grammarian, and difficulties assail the student, demanding, for their complete mastery, a more than ordinary degree of mental application and capacity. In Sanscrit, on the other hand, the subject of syntax is reducible to a few plain rules, and
might almost be merged in that of compound words. The almost entire absence of prepositions in government with nouns removes one fertile source of difficulty; and such is the extraordinary prevalence of compounds, that the student who has acquired a thorough insight into their formation has little else to learn, and the writer who has properly expounded this portion of the grammar has already more than half completed his investigation into the laws which regulate syntactical combinations. We shall endeavour, in the present chapter, to collect together all the most useful rules for the connection and collocation of uncompounded words, presupposing, as we have done throughout, that the student is acquainted with the general principles of the subject before us. Much vagueness and uncertainty, however, may be expected to attach to the rules propounded, when it is remembered that Sanscrit literature consists almost entirely of poetry, and that the laws of syntax are ever prone to yield to the necessities of metrical composition.
Observe, in the present chapter on Syntax, that the subject may be made as clear as possible, each word will be separated from the next, and vowels will not be allowed to coalesce, although such coalition be required by the laws of combination. Whenever compounds are introduced into the examples, a dot, placed underneath, will mark the division of the words. The examples have been, in general, selected from the Hitopadesha, or the Mahābhārata, with the view of serving as an easy delectus, in which the beginner may exercise himself before passing to continuous translation.
CONCORD OF THE VERB WITH THE NOMINATIVE CASE.
172. The verb must agree with the nominative case in number and person, as in the following examples: s malfu, “I must perform ;" waite, “do thou attend"; # Eçin, “ he gives ";
we two say "; atat frys, “the pigeons said "; U Hreit pagi, “the king and minister went": 49 gaf fren:, “as long as the moon and sun remain "; geit fermeti,“ do you two reflect"; यूयम् आयात, “ do ye come "; सज्जनाः पूज्यने, “good men are honoured"; qua erat, “the wind blows "; rufat , moon rises "; fyre fet gai, “the flower blossoms.
Tai ga:, च जग्मतुः
a. When a participle takes the place of the verb, it must agree with the nominative in number and gender; as, # ta:," he went"; HT TAT, she went"; नार्याव् उक्तवत्यौ, “ the two women spoke"; राजा EN:, “the king was killed "; Tarifa foalfat, “ the bonds were cut."
b. Sometimes, when it is placed between two or more nominative cases, it agrees with one only; as, By:
“his wife and son were awakened.” c. Very often the copula, or verb which connects the subject with the predicate, is omitted; when, if an adjective stand in the place of the verb, it will follow the rules of concord in gender and number; as, ri, “wealth is difficult of attainment "; erai PATETÀ,“ we two have finished eating. ” But if a substantive stand in the place of the verb, no concord of gender or number need take place; as, HAIG: 4G7 W19Cİ, successes are the road to misfortunes.”
CONCORD OF THE ADJECTIVE WITH THE SUBSTANTIVE.
173. An adjective, participle, or adjective pronoun, qualifying a substantive, when not compounded with it, must agree with the substantive in gender, number, and case; as, Hry: 964:, “a good man ”; HET GT,“ great pain "; ang galing tay, “in these beforementioned countries "; tfu fenfu, “three friends."
CONCORD OF THE RELATIVE WITH THE ANTECEDENT.
174 The Relative must agree with the antecedent noun in gender, number, and person; but, in Sanscrit, the relative pronoun almost invariably precedes the noun to which it refers, and this noun is then put in the same case with the relative, and the pronoun #: generally follows in the latter clause of the sentence; as, HRT Alegre: #96arat, “of whatever man there is intellect, he is strong The noun referred to by the relative may also be joined with सः, as, यस्य बुद्धिः स नरो बलवान्; or may be omitted altogether, as, a ufasiri na 410004, “What you have promised, that abide by"; येषाम् अपत्यानि खादितानि तैः (पक्षिभिः, understood) जिज्ञासा समारव्या, Ву those (birds) whose young ones were devoured, an inquiry was set on foot."
a. The Relative sometimes stands alone, an antecedent noun or pronoun being understood, from which it takes its gender and num