I stand in pause where I shall first begin, -Pray, I cannot Tho' inclination be as sharp as th'ill. Were Amidst this multitude of conjectures, I must own myself not fatisfied. 1 think by one flight addition we may greatly clear up the difficulty. The king, conscious of his own guilt, is defirous, yet afraid, to repent and pray: is it not natural that he should say; A brother's murder-Pray, I would, yet] cannot Now this flight addition will explain the next puzzling line: let us confider, what we may reasonably expect him to have faid after this: "I wou'd pray, but I cannot, tho' my inclination, [my great defire] to do fo is no less powerful and perfuafive with me, than the already determined resolution of my mind fo to do: that is, I am no less defirous to do what I would (namely, pray) and cannot, than I am refolv'd to do so:" the seeming want of difference between inclination and will, caufes all the obscurity: if the reader attends to that, and observes, that by inclination he means, a longing defire, a difpofition to do it with pleasure; and by will, the determination of the mind, the actual resolution, I think all will be clear: and the words I have added in the foregoing line, if not genuine, (tho' they seem to bid fair for it) at least add to the explaining the poet's thought. The latter fine lines, Try what repentance can, what can it not? throw fome light on these in question: he could not pray, for his guilt defeated his intent: here he would try the force of allpowerful repentance, yet again is check'd by his guilty confcience: for tho', fays he, repentance can do all things, yet what can it do when one cannot really and truly use it? when we are indeed defirous of repenting, but are by our guilt prevented from so doing: when we would fly to its aid, and be pardon'd for our offence, and yet retain the offence itself, and beg for forgiveness, while we still are guilty? the whole fpeech is a comment on it felf. In Philafter, the king is praying to be forgiven, tho' still retaining his offence, as here: But how can I Look to be heard of gods, that must be just, 1 Were thicker than itself with brother's blood? All may be well. Enter Hamlet. [The King kucels. Ham. (29) Now might I do it pat, now he is pray ing; And now I'll do't, and so he goes to heaven, (29) It has been remarked, there is great want of refolution in Hamlet, for when he had fo good an opportunity to kill his uncle and revenge his father, as here, he shuffles it off with a paltry excuse, and is afraid to do what he so ardently longs for: the And fo am I reveng'd?-that would be scann'd- To heav'n! O! this is hire and falary, not revenge. Then trip him, that his heels may kick at heaven, SCENE X. Part of the Scene between Hamlet and his Mother. Queen. What have I done that thou dar'st wag thy tongue In noise so rude against me? That blurs the grace and blush of modesty, The the observation may be confirmed from many other passages: in the next page, he himself observes, that all occafions do inform againß bim,and spur bis dull revenge: but 'tis not my design in this work, to enter into exact criticism on the characters. The very foul, and sweet religion makes Queen. Ah me, what act! Ham. Look here, upon this picture, and on this; The counterfeit presentment of two brothers. See what a grace was feated on this brow; Hyperion's curls, the front of Jove himself, An eye like Mars, to threaten or command, (30) A station like the herald Mercury, New lighted on a heaven-kitling hill; A combination, and a form indeed, Where every god did seem to fet his feal, To give the world affurance of a man: This was your husband. Look you now what follows; Here is your husband, like a (31) mildew'd ear, Blafting his wholesome brother. Have you eyes? Could you on this fair mountain leave to feed, And batten on this moor? Queen. O, Hamlet, speak no more; Thou turn'st mine eyes into my very foul, And there I fee fuch black and grained spots, As will not leave their tinct. Enter 1 (30) A Station, &c.] The poet employs this word in a sense different from what it is generally used to fignify: for it means here, an attitude, a filent pofture, fixt demeanor of perfon, in oppofition to an active behaviour. Theobald. 'Tis very probable Milton took the first hint of the following fine lines from the prefent paffage : Like Maia's son he stood, And shook his plumes, that heavenly fragrance fill'd (31) Mildew'd ear.] Probably he alludes to Pharaoh's dream, Gen. xli. And he dreamed and behold feven ears of corn came up on one stalk rank and good: and behold seven thin ears and blafted with the east wind, sprang up after them: and the thin ears devoured the rank and full ears. See v. 22. Enter Ghost. Ham. Save me, and hover o'er me with your wings, You heavenly guards; what would your gracious figure? Queen. Alas! he's mad. Ham. Do you not come your tardy fon to chide That, laps'd in time and paffion, lets go by Ghoft. Do not forget; this vifitation Ham. How is it with you, madam? Your bedded hairs, like (32) life in excrements, Start (32) Like life in excrements.] Shakespear very frequently calls the hair an excrement, that is, without life or fensation, and his meaning here is, Hamlet's furprize had fuch an effect on him, that his hairs, as if there was life in those excrementitious parts, started up and stood on end. So, in Macbeth, And my fell of hair Wou'd at a difmal treatise rouse and stir My notes on this play have so much swelled under my hand, I am oblig'd to lay aside a design I had of giving the reader a tranflation of the discourse between Hamkt and his mother, from Saxo Grammaticus, which is extremely fine, and will be no small amusement to the reader if he thinks proper to confult that hiftorian; from whom Shakespear has taken the whole of Hamkt's disguis'd madness; the scene before us; his friendship with Horatio; the death of Polonius; his banishment into England; his return from thence, and killing the ufurper. The Gloft feems to have been his own invention. |