I ftand in paufe where I fhall first begin, And both neglect. -Pray, I cannot Were Tho' inclination be as fharp as th'ill. Amidst this multitude of conjectures, I must own myself not fatisfied. 1 think by one flight addition we may greatly clear up the difficulty. The king, confcious of his own guilt, is defirous, yet afraid, to repent and pray: is it not natural that be fhould fay; A brother's murder-Pray, I [would, yet] cannot- Now this flight addition will explain the next puzzling line: let us confider, what we may reasonably expect him to have said after this: "I wou'd pray, but I cannot, tho' my inclination, [my great defire] to do fo is no lefs powerful and perfuafive with me, than the already determined refolution of my mind fo to do: that is, I am no lefs defirous to do what I would (namely, pray) and cannot, than I am refolv'd to do fo:" the feeming want of difference between inclination and will, caufes all the obfcurity: if the reader attends to that, and obferves, that by inclination he means, a longing defire, a difpofition to do it with pleasure; and by will, the determination of the mind, the actual refolution, I think all will be clear: and the words I have added in the foregoing line, if not genuine, (tho' they feem to bid fair for it) at least add to the explaining the poet's thought. The lat ter fine lines, Try what repentance can, what can it not? throw fome light on these in question: he could not pray, for his guilt defeated his intent: here he would try the force of allpowerful repentance,yet again is check'd by his guilty confcience: for tho', fays he, repentance can do all things, yet what can it do when one cannot really and truly ufe it? when we are indeed defirous of repenting, but are by our guilt prevented from fo doing when we would fly to its aid, and be pardon'd for our offence, and yet retain the offence itself, and beg for forgiveness, while we still are guilty? the whole fpeech is a comment on it felf. In Philafter, the king is praying to be forgiven, tho' still retaining his offence, as here: But how can I Look to be heard of gods, that must be juft, Were thicker than itself with brother's blood? And what's in prayer, but this twofold force, Or pardon'd being down? Then I'll look up; Of thofe effects for which I did the murder, All may be well. Enter Hamlet. [The King kucels. Ham. (29) Now might I do it pat, now he is pray ing; And now I'll do't, and fo he goes to heaven, (29) It has been remarked, there is great want of refolution in Hamlet, for when he had fo good an opportunity to kill his uncle and revenge his father, as here, he fhuffles it off with a paltry excufe, and is afraid to do what he so ardently longs for: the And fo am I reveng'd ?-that would be feann'd- 1, his fole fon, do this fame villain fend To heav'n! O! this is hire and falary, not revenge. With all his crimes broad blown, as flufh as May; Then trip him, that his heels may kick at heaven, SCENE X. Part of the Scene between Hamlet and his Mother. Queen. What have I done that thou dar'st wag thy tongue In noise fo rude against me? Ham. Such an act, That blurs the grace and blush of modefty, The the obfervation may be confirmed from many other paffages: in the next page, he himself obferves, that all occafions do inform againf bim,and fpur his dull revenge: but 'tis not my design in this work, to enter into exact criticism on the characters. The very foul, and fweet religion makes Queen. Ah me, what act! Ham. Look here, upon this picture, and on this; This was your husband. Look you now what follows; Queen. O, Hamlet, speak no more; Enter 1 (30) A Station, &c.] The poet employs this word in a fense different from what it is generally ufed to fignify: for it means here, an attitude, a filent pofture, fixt demeanor of perfon, in oppofition to an active behaviour. Theobald. 'Tis very probable Milton took the firft hint of the following fine lines from the prefent paffage : Like Maia's fon he stood, (31) Mildew'd car.] Probably he alludes to Pharaoh's dream, Gen. xli. And he dreamed and behold feven ears of corn came up on one stalk rank and good: and behold seven thin ears and blafed with the eaft wind, fprang up after them: and the thin ears de voured the rank and full ears. See v. 22. Enter Ghoft. Ham. Save me, and hover o'er me with your wings, You heavenly guards; what would your gracious figure? Queen. Alas! he's mad. Ham. Do you not come your tardy fon to chide Ghoft. Do not forget; this vifitation Ham. How is it with you, madam? That thus you bend your eye on vacancy, Your bedded hairs, like (32) life in excrements, Start (32) Like life in excrements.] Shakespear very frequently calls the hair an excrement, that is, without life or fenfation, and his meaning here is, Hamlet's furprize had fuch an effect on him,that his hairs, as if there was life in thofe excrementitious parts,ftarted up and stood on end. So, in Macbeth, And my fell of hair Wou'd at a difmal treatise rouse and stir As life were in't. My notes on this play have fo much fwelled under my hand, I am oblig'd to lay afide a defign I had of giving the reader a tranflation of the difcourfe between Hamlet and his mother, from Saxo Grammaticus, which is extremely fine, and will be no small amufement to the reader if he thinks proper to confult that hiftorian; from whom Shakespear has taken the whole of Hamlet's difguis'd madnefs; the scene before us; his friendship with Horatio; the death of Polonius; his banishment into England; his return from thence, and killing the ufurper.-The Ghoft feems to have been his own invention. |