« AnteriorContinua »
On the 22nd of August, 1485, there was a battle fought for the crown of England, a short battle ending in a decisive victory. In that field a crowned king, “ manfully fighting in the middle of his enemies, was slain and brought to his death;” and a politic adventurer put on the crown, which the immediate descendants of his house wore for nearly a century and a quarter. The battlefield was Bosworth. “When the earl had thus obtained victory and slain his mortal enemy, he kneeled down and rendered to Almighty God his hearty thanks, with devout and godly orisons. Which prayer finished, he, replenished with incomparable gladness, ascended up to the top of a little mountain, where he not only praised and lauded his valiant soldiers, but also gave unto them his hearty thanks, with promise of condign recompense for their fidelity and valiant facts."* Two months afterwards the Earl of Richmond was * Hall's Chronicle.
more solemnly crowned and anointed at Westminster by the name of King
“ Whose muse, full of high thought's invention,
Doth like himself heroically sound ;" $a Shakspere, of whom it was also said,
“ He seems to shake a lance
As brandish'd at the eyes of ignorance." || Certainly there was a Shakspere, the paternal ancestor of William Shakspere, who, if he stood not nigh the little mountain when the Earl of Richmond promised condign recompense to his valiant soldiers, was amongst those especial friends and fautors whom Henry VII. enriched with possessions and goods. A public document bearing the date of 1596 affirms of John Shakspere of Stratford-uponAvon, the father of William Shakspere, that his “parent and late antecessors were, for their valiant and faithful services, advanced and rewarded of the most prudent prince King Henry VII. of famous memory;” and it adds, “sithence which time they have continued at those parts [Warwickshire) in good reputation and credit." Another document of a similar character, bearing the date of 1599, also affirms upon “ creditable report,” of “ John Shakspere, now of Stratford-upon-Avon, in the county of Warwick, gentleman,” that his “ parent and great-grandfather, late antecessor, for his faithful and approved service to the late most prudent prince King Henry VII. of famous memory, was advanced and rewarded with lands and tenements, given to him in those parts of Warwickshire, where they have continued by some descents in good reputation and credit.” Such are the recitals of two several grants of arms to John Shakspere, confirming a previous grant made to him in 1569; and let it not be said that these statements were the rhodomontades of heraldry,-honours bestowed, for mere mercenary considerations, upon any pretenders to gentle blood. There was strict inquiry if they were unworthily bestowed. Two centuries and a half ago
* Hall's Chronicle.
+ A list of the brethren and sisters of the Guild of Knowle, near Rowington, in Warwickshire, exhibits a great number of the name of Shakspere in that fraternity, from about 1460 to 1527; and the names are spelt with the diversity here given, Shakspere being the latest. I Verstegan's 'Restitution,' &c.
|| Ben Jonson.
such honours were of grave importance; and there is a solemnity in the tone of these very documents which, however it may provoke a smile from what we call philosophy, was connected with high and generous principles : “Know ye that in all nations and kingdoms the record and remembrance of the valiant facts and virtuous dispositions of worthy men have been made known and divulged by certain shields of arms and tokens of chivalry.” In those parts of Warwickshire, then, lived and died, we may assume, the faithful and approved servant of the “unknown Welshman, as Richard called him, who won for himself the more equivocal name of “the most prudent prince.” He was probably advanced in years when Henry ascended the throne; for in the first year of Queen Elizabeth, , 1558, his great-grandson, John Shakspere, was a burgess of the corporation of Stratford, and was in all probability born about 1530. John Shakspere was of the third generation succeeding the adherent of Henry VII. The family had continued in those parts, “ by some descents;" but how they were occupied in the business of life, what was their station in society, how they branched out into other lines of Shaksperes, we have no record. They probably were cultivators of the soil, unambitious small proprietors, not quite so luxurious as Chaucer's “Frankelein,” of whom it is said
“ Withouten bake mete never was his hous,
Of fish and flesh, and that so plenteous,
It snewed in his hous of mete and drinke;" — nor so powerful and ambitious as he :
“At sessions ther was he lord and sire.
Ful often time he was knight of the shire.” They, perhaps, somewhat more resembled the “ Plowman,"
“ That hadde ylaid of dong ful many a fother.
A trewe swinker, and a good, was he,
Living in pees and parfite charitee.” A painter of manners, who comes nearer to the times of John Shakspere than the great author of the Canterbury Tales,' has described the probable condition of his immediate ancestors : “ Yeomen are those which by our law are called legales homines, free men born English. ... The truth is, that the word is derived from the Saxon term zeoman, or geoman, which signifieth (as I have read) a settled or staid man. This sort of people have a certain preeminence and more estimation than labourers and the common sort of artificers, and these commonly live wealthily, keep good houses, and travel to get riches. They are also for the most part farmers to gentlemen, or at the leastwise artificers; and with grazing, frequenting of markets, and keeping of servants (not idle servants as the gentlemen do, but such as get both their own and part
of their masters' living), do come to great wealth, insomuch that many of them are able and do buy the lands of unthrifty gentlemen, and often, setting their sons to the schools, to the universities, and to the inns of the court, or otherwise leaving them sufficient lands whereupon they may live without labour, do make them by those means to become gentlemen: these were they that in times past made all France afraid.” Plain-speaking Harrison, who wrote this description in the