ger of a rebellion fanctified by the Church, than by the following words of Morton ; MORTON. The gentle Archbishop of York is up Turns infurrection to religion: Suppos'd fincere and holy in his thoughts, He's follow'd both with body and with mind, And doth enlarge his rifing with the blood Nor Nor can the indecency of a prelate's appearing in arms, and the abuse of an authority derived from the facred function, be more strongly arraigned, than in the speeches of Westmorland, and John of Lancaster. WESTMORLAND. Then, my lord, Unto your grace do I in chief addrefs The fubftance of my speech. If that rebellion Had not been here to drefs the ugly form Of base and bloody infurrection, With your fair honours. You, my lord archbishop, Whose fee is by a civil peace maintain'd, Whose beard the filver hand of peace hath touch'd, Wherefore Wherefore do you fo ill tranflate yourself, My lord of York, it better fhew'd with you, It is ev'n fo. Who hath not heard it spoken, To us, the speaker in his parliament, To us th’imagin'd voice of heav'n itself, Employ Employ the countenance and grace of heav'n, The archbishop of York, even when he appears an iron man, keeps up the gravity and seeming sanctity of his character, and wears the mitre over his helmet. He is not, like Hotspur, a valiant rebel, full of noble anger and fierce defiance, he speaks like a cool politician to his friends, and like a deep defigning hypocrite to his enemies, and pretends he is only acting as physician to the ftate, I have before obferved, that Shakespear had the talents of an Orator, as much as of a Poet; and I believe it will be allowed, that the speeches of Westmorland and Lancaster are as proper on this occafion, and the particular circumstances as happily touch'd, as they could 4 1 could have been, by the moft judicious orator. I know not that any poet, ancient or modern, has shewn fo perfect a judgment in rhetoric as our countryman. I wish he had employed his eloquence likewife, in arraigning the baseness and treachery of John of Lancaster's conduct, in breaking his covenant with the rebels. Pistol is an odd kind of perfonage, intended probably to ridicule fome fashionable affectation of bombaft language. When fuch characters exift no longer but in the writings, where they have been ridiculed, they feem to have been monsters of the poet's brain. The originals loft and the mode forgotten, one can neither praise the imitation, nor laugh at the ridicule. Comic writers should therefore always exhibit some characteristic diftinctions, as well as temporary modes. Juftice Shallow will for ever rank with a certain fpecies of men; he is like a well painted portrait in the dress of his age. Piftol appears a mere antiquated habit, fo uncouthly fashioned, we can hardly believe, 2 |