Ch. 5. Almagro's men. foot-soldier between three and four thousand. B. XVI. The name of Vicente de Valverde is not in the list, so that at least the vice of avarice cannot be imputed to him. Pizarro made over to Almagro a hundred thousand pesos as a compensation for the expenses which had been incurred in their Pizarro's partnership. To Almagro's soldiers twenty thou- gratuity to sand pesos were awarded, which seems a very small sum indeed, and must have been totally inadequate to satisfy their cravings. The whole sum did not amount to that which was paid to any three of Pizarro's horsemen, and would by Rise of no means have compensated for the extravagant the camp. increase in prices which this influx of gold caused in the Spanish camp. * *The common price for a horse was fifteen hundred pesos; a bottle of wine cost seventy pesos; a sheet of paper ten pesos; a head of garlic half a peso.See XEREZ, p. 233. The strangest result, however, of this influx of gold was that creditors shunned their debtors, and absolutely hid themselves to prices in B. XVI. Guascar Inca's fate. CHAPTER VI. GUASCAR INCA'S FATE-ATAHUALLPA'S WHILE * ATAHUALLPA'S EXECUTION. TRIAL HILE this wholesale spoliation of Peru was going on, it had fared ill with Guascar Inca, the legitimate sovereign of that kingdom. There is a story, unsupported by much evidence, but which appears not improbable, that Pizarro's messengers to Cusco met those persons who had charge of the fallen Inca, and that he implored the Spaniards to take him under their protection, and to convey him to Pizarro's camp, offering, as might be expected, great largesses. But they, not a whit more politic in this respect than their master, took no heed of his request, and passed * The names given by ZÁRATE and GOMARA, are Fernando de Soto and Pedro de Barca. The way in which I would reconcile the conflicting accounts about the embassage to Cusco, is, that there were two missions from the camp-one in which Fernando de Soto and Pedro de Barca were concerned, and which, perhaps, had no definite orders to go to Cusco; and the other consisting of Pedro Moguer, Zarate, and Martin Bueno, which went direct to Cusco. There is a passage in Xerez which favours this view. Immediately after speaking of Fernando Pizarro's departure, he says, "Fifteen days after, there arrived at Cassamarca certain Christians with a great quantity of gold and silver." Who could these Christians have been? The embassage to Cusco, according to the same authority, had not yet been sent out. These Christians, therefore, were probably Fernando de Soto and Pedro de Barca, or messengers from them. Ch. 6. on to Cusco. It is added, that the fact of this B. XVI. interview, being communicated to Atahuallpa, hastened Guascar Inca's death. It is also said that Atahuallpa, wishing to issue the order for his brother's execution, yet fearing what Pizarro would say and do if such a step were taken, made a trial of the Governor in the following manner. On Pizarro's coming to visit him one day, the Inca assumed a very sorrowful appearance; and, being pressed to declare the cause of his grief, said that Guascar Inca had been put to death by the captains who had charge of him, without his (Atahuallpa's) orders. Upon this, the Governor is said to have soothed him with some commonplace remarks about death being the ordinary lot of mortals, whereupon the Inca, freed from the fear of Pizarro's wrath, hesitated no longer to give orders for his brother's execution. The truth is, however, that the Scotch form of verdict, "not proven," is all that can be said against Atahuallpa as regards his brother's death. There is no doubt that it was deeply for the interest of Atahuallpa that Guascar should die, as it was of Pizarro to secure his person. In such a despotism, still apparently so blindly obeyed, it is difficult to conceive that Atahuallpa's captains would venture to put their prisoner to death without receiving orders from their master. On the other hand, it must be remembered that it concerned the interest of these captains as much as that of their master that Guascar Inca 568 Parting of Fernando Pizarro and Atahuallpa. B. XVI. should die. If, out of all these troubled events, Ch. 6. Guascar should rise again to power, what might Whether they not apprehend from his vengeance? Then, was guilty again, it must be recollected that Atahuallpa Atahuallpa of his brother's death. has no friends amongst the chroniclers of those times, for Garcilaso de la Vega, in general the defender of his countrymen, was a descendant of the legitimate branch of the Incarial family, and the cruelties exercised by Atahuallpa's captains towards this branch of the royal house were no doubt a fertile subject of discourse with the old Indian chiefs who were wont to talk to Garcilaso in his boyhood of the events of bygone days. Pizarro's secretary simply states that messengers arrived to say that Guascar was dead. It may also be noticed that in a document, drawn up by a notary, narrating the principal circumstances which took place after Fernando Pizarro left for Spain until the Governor entered Cusco, which was meant for Charles the Fifth's perusal, and which is signed by the Governor, there is no mention of the death of Guascar Inca as part of the charge against Atahuallpa. Leaving Atahuallpa what benefit these considerations may afford him, we must proceed to give an account of his own fate. Atahuallpa seems to have been well aware that the newly-arrived Spaniards were anything but favourable to him. On taking leave of Fernando Pizarro, the Inca said, "I am sorry that you are going; for when you are gone, I know that that fat man and that one-eyed man will contrive to kill me." The fat man was Alonzo Riquelme, the King's treasurer; the one- B. XVI. eyed man was Almagro. Ch. 6. allpa's Then, too, it has been stated that the inter- Atahu preter Felipillo, being in love with one of Ata- enemies. huallpa's wives or concubines-an affront which it is said the Inca felt more than anything which had occurred to him,-was desirous of compassing Atahuallpa's death. It has been believed by some that Pizarro had from the first intended to put his prisoner to death; but this is probably one of those numerous instances of a practice indulged in by historians of attributing a longconceived and deliberate policy to their heroes in reference to some event, because the event was all along familiar to the historian's mind, though not at all so to the mind of the hero of the story. character. If I read Pizarro's character rightly, he may Pizarro's have been a suspicious man, but he was not a man of deep plans and projects. That he was likely to conceal his plans, when formed, is true; and there is a pleasing little anecdote indicative of his character in that respect, which may be mentioned here. Hearing that one of his soldiers had lost his horse, and was unable, from poverty, to purchase another, Pizarro concealed under his robe a large plate of gold, and going down to play in the tennis-court, where he expected to meet this soldier, but where he did not find him, the Governor played on for hours, with this great weight about him, until he espied the soldier and was able to draw him aside and give him the gold in secret, not without complaining of what |