MRS. FORD. ACT IV. Scene 2. Page 448, and her muffler too. It would oppress the reader by citing authorities to prove that the muffler was a contrivance of various kinds to conceal a part of the face, and that even a mask was occasionally so denominated. From an examination of several ancient prints and paintings, it appears that when the muffler was made of linen it only covered the lower part of the face. Such it was in the present instance; for the old woman of Brentford would not want to conceal her eyes. It is otherwise in King Henry V. Act iii. Sc. 1. where Fortune's blindness is described; and there a linen bandage would be meant, but perhaps not very correctly called a muffler. The term is connected with the old French musser or muçer to hide, or with amuseler to cover the museau or mufle, a word which has been indiscriminately used for the mouth, nose, and even the whole of the face. Hence our muzzle. It was enacted by a Scotish statute in 1457, that "na woman cum to kirk, nor mercat, with her face mussaled or covered that scho may not be kend." Notwithstanding this interposition of the legislature, says Mr. Warton, the ladies of Scotland continued muzzled during three reigns; and he cites Sir David Lyndsay's poem In contemptioun of syde taillis, in which the author advises the King to issue a proclamation that the women should shew their faces as they did in France. Hist. of Eng. poetry, i. 324. The annexed cuts exhibit different sorts of mufflers. The first and third figures are copied from Jost Amman's Theatrum mulierum, Francof. 1586, 4to; the second, from Speed's Map of England, is the costume of an English countrywoman in the reign of James I; the fourth is from an old German print; and the others from Weigel's Habitus præcipuorum populorum, Nuremb. 1577, folio, a work which, for the beauty of the wood cuts, has never been surpassed. In the reign of Charles I. the ladies wore masks which covered the eye-brows and nose, holes being left for the eyes. Sometimes, but not always, the mouth was covered, and the chin guarded with a sort of muffler then called a chincloth. These were chiefly used to keep off the sun. See Hollar's print of Winter. The velvet masks probably came from France, as they are mentioned in the Book of values of merchandize imported, under the administration of Oliver Cromwell. There was another sort called visard masks that covered all the face, having holes only for the eyes, a case for the nose, and a slit for the mouth. They were easily disengaged, being held in the teeth by means of a round bead fastened in the inside. These masks were usually made of leather, covered with black velvet. Randle Holme, from whose Academy of armory, book iii. c. 5, their description is extracted, adds, that the devil invented them, and that none about court except ws, bawds, and the devil's imps used them, being ashamed to shew their faces. Sc. 2. p. 450. PAGE. Why this passes ! The word had been already explained by War burton in p. 329. Page, astonished at Ford's conduct, says it exceeds every thing. Such is the sense in the New Testament, "the love of Christ, which passeth knowledge," Ephes. iii. 19. The French often use passer in the same manner; and in Hamlet we have this expression, "I have that within which passeth show." Mr. Steevens derives it from the Dutch, a language whence we have borrowed few, if any words. The term is of Saxon origin, and leveman can be traced to an Anglo-Norman period. This was afterwards contracted into leman. The etymology is perhaps from leore, amabilis, and Man, homo. The latter in Saxon denoted both man and woman; so that leman was formerly applied to both sexes as a person beloved. This expression is from the same law manufactory referred to by Mr. Ritson in the preceding note. The incident in the present scene, of Fal |